|
by Bodybag 10/16/2011, 6:03pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fullofkittens wrote:
It's rare to find a horror movie that's even better than you remembered it. I hadn't seen The Thing (1982) for probably ten years, watched it again last night on Netflix streaming.
HERE'S A THING THAT HOLLYWOOD CANNOT SEEM TO DO ANYMORE: create a believable workplace. That's something I noticed while watching Alien as well: both films are set in totally imaginary places and yet the environment seems like it's lived-in and the characters seem like they know each other. Maybe it's all down to the cast? Moon is a notable modern exception.
Anyways, here's a couple of great things(!) about the 1982 film:
- The pacing. The movie does an awesome job of getting you to understand where the movie is set (with the beautiful and strange helicopter sequence at the beginning) and letting you get to know the characters by seeing what they do when something happens. It notably does *not* introduce the setting and characters by bringing a new person onto the base and bringing them around for introductions.
- The gore! Either I am used to a TV version or the director's cut is now the standard cut, but there is some CRAZY in-camera gore in the movie. The scene with dogs is a masterpiece. The scene with the defibrillators! YAAAAY.
- As you mentioned: the characters act like fucking grownups for once. Wilford Brimley does an autopsy on this horribly mangled half-corpse half-mutant half-alien thing (which, BTW, is shown in loving detail, which would not happen now. Too much work!) and he correctly intuits that what they are seeing is some kind of organism that mimics other organisms and it was killed before it completely transforms. No one says "THIS IS RIDICULOUS I WON'T STAND HERE WHILE YOU TALK THIS GARBAGE" and no one goes hysterical and fucks everybody over by being a giant baby and screwing up. These are guys who work in Antarctica! They are confronted with a very serious problem and they decide that they need the flamethrowers.
- The gore again.
- The ending (though a lot of horror movies have gone this route so it's super remarkable in this regard, but at least it's not insulting).
Agreed. Using practical effects, having confidence in a cast & script, and generally showing some restraint is apparently the difference between a shitty remake and a seminal classic.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
So The Thing wasn't good by fabio 10/16/2011, 3:00pm PDT 
Rewatched the original last night. by Fullofkittens 10/16/2011, 3:56pm PDT 
First of all, it wasn't EVEN the original. *pushes glasses up nose* by Bodybag 10/16/2011, 6:03pm PDT 
Re: Rewatched the original last night. by fabio 10/16/2011, 6:16pm PDT 
*nose glasses* the 1982 score was by Ennio Morricone. (spoilers) by Fullofkittens 10/20/2011, 11:07am PDT 
Re: *nose glasses* the 1982 score was by Ennio Morricone. (spoilers) by fabio 10/20/2011, 12:41pm PDT 
I had a comparative lit/film class that covered "The Thing" by Roop 10/17/2011, 3:41pm PDT 
Like most terrible modern movie trends, I place this blame squarely on Michael B by ay -fabio 06/02/2012, 2:18pm PDT 
Blame the Brady Bunch movie instead. by Mischief Maker 06/02/2012, 8:22pm PDT 
I'm going to take your word by fabio 06/03/2012, 1:53am PDT 
Every superhero movie origin story refutes your post NT by Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) 06/03/2012, 6:36pm PDT 
Like most terrible modern movie trends, I place this blame squarely on Michael B by Ice Cream Jonsey 01/28/2013, 8:25pm PST 
(Watching The Thing 1982 because of the snow showers tonight.) by Ice Cream Jonsey 01/28/2013, 8:27pm PST 
Re: Like most terrible modern movie trends, I place this blame squarely on M by fabio 01/28/2013, 10:57pm PST 
Will do. Some other thoughts: by Ice Cream Jonsey 01/29/2013, 7:42am PST 
I, too, can recommend China Syndrome. NT by Eurotrash 01/28/2013, 11:43pm PST 
I just started watching Falling Skies and then stopped forever by Rafiki 02/10/2013, 2:25pm PST 
My parents recently got into the prime time post apocalyptic phase by fabio 02/10/2013, 5:07pm PST 
I thought the 2010 remake of The Crazies was pretty good in this regard. by Jerry Whorebach 02/11/2013, 11:31pm PST 
Well let me be the contrarian here. by Mischief Maker 02/12/2013, 8:55am PST 
Re: Well let me be the contrarian here. by fabio 02/12/2013, 10:41am PST 
Re: Well let me be the contrarian here. by Fullofkittens 02/12/2013, 12:04pm PST 
Re: Well let me be the contrarian here. by fabio 02/12/2013, 3:54pm PST 
I imagine the Zombie Apocalypse will be followed by the Friendly Fire Apocalypse by laudablepuss 02/12/2013, 8:35pm PST 
Re: Well let me be the contrarian here. by Mischief Maker 02/12/2013, 9:03pm PST 
This is a pristine Caltrops comment by hall of fame poster awarder 06/26/2026, 10:46pm PDT 
Re: So The Thing wasn't good by motherfuckerfoodeater 10/17/2011, 12:21pm PDT 
I hope this isn't sarcastic by Art 101 10/17/2011, 7:03pm PDT 
Apparently they had practical effects all set to go by fabio 12/17/2011, 8:07am PST 
World-class practical effects, and they're not in the movie? Seriously? NT by Eurotrash 12/18/2011, 12:00am PST 
Re: Apparently they had practical effects all set to go by Mischief IP Necromancer 01/17/2012, 9:09am PST 
Finally saw it. Not great, but I enjoyed it. by Eurotrash 05/21/2012, 12:15am PDT 
Re: So The Thing wasn't good by Ice Cream Jonsey 12/22/2011, 8:52pm PST 
green lantern is worse by jeep 12/22/2011, 9:49pm PST 
An hour in and it's OK. It's bad, but better than The Thing redux by Ice Cream Jonsey 12/22/2011, 10:02pm PST 
Re: An hour in and it's OK. It's bad, but better than The Thing redux by Ice Cream Jonsey 05/21/2012, 7:22am PDT 
The remake that should have been made has been made. by Fullofkitttens 01/04/2012, 8:27am PST 
Motherfucker, I was JUST coming here to post this. >:( NT by Last 01/11/2012, 9:45am PST 
The pros' opinion by fabio 02/05/2013, 11:51pm PST 
|
|