|
by Ice Cream Jonsey Yesterday, 2:55pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
pinback wrote:
It started streaming last Friday and I've watched it twice more since then. It is VERY rewatchable, because:
1) that environment will always be interesting/spooky/enjoyable to hang out in
2) the whole movie is easy on the eyes and ears all the way through, like sweet, liminal honey
3) there are so many details that you cannot help but notice new things each trip true
I agree with myself that B+ is the right rating, although being a fan of the source material and just being happy that it exists and was done so well, personally I'll count it among my "faves", but objectively, B+.
There is still the issue of the middle part of the movie missing. You forget just how fast we go from Clark enlisting the kids' help, introducing them to that wall, and then everyone being dead and Clark set up shop in his little Backrooms house.
There is the issue of the dead-eyed psychologist who fulfills her purpose, and her flimsy backstory does just enough to link the movie's themes together, but ultimately she's almost as much of a "still life" as the guy with six eyeballs whose gut is made of cotton candy.
There is the issue (and this is also a flaw in Kane's Youtubes) that "WHAT THE FUCK?!" is all side characters are ever able to say. Even the ASYNC guys say it. They sound like bratty kids instead of professional scientific investigators.
There are issues. But all minor, and do not detract from my enjoyment. Like I said before, good job Kane.
The main guy is the only really good actor in the movie, but he's SO goddamn good that he carries it easily. Good job, Chiwi.. Cheliw... Good job Celhiw...
Good job, Clark.
I watched Five Nights at Freddy's after The Backrooms. I had to, my little buddy is all about "FNaF" right now.
- FNaF does NOT give us a taste at the beginning of what everyone coming in cares about. We don't see the first animatronic move in FNaF into almost an hour into the picture.
- Kane enlisted, I think, the help of an old(er) person for the motivations and story of Clark. The script writer of FNaF just made up some stuff a twentysomething would go through and it sucked.
- I don't think there is much wasted dialogue in the Backrooms. The dialogue is bad in FNaF. I would go so far to say that the opening phone call on the voice mail for the first FNaF is downright iconic. And it's nowhere in the movie, we have the protagonist get the job by talking to Matthew Lilliard in person. In person!
A contrast of two "internet" phenomenona turned into movies, one a series of short films and the other a game, one much much better at being a movie than the other. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
B+ by pinback 06/07/2026, 2:54pm PDT 
The movie's biggest flaw (spoilers!) by pinback 06/08/2026, 5:08am PDT 
Umm, blackwater? by pinback 06/09/2026, 6:54am PDT 
I have to say I loved it! A+ from me. by blackwater 06/11/2026, 7:48pm PDT 
A+?? I mean, yeah, I liked it too... by pinback 06/12/2026, 5:31am PDT 
Ahem. NT by Peter Griffin 06/12/2026, 6:10am PDT 
Re: A+?? I mean, yeah, I liked it too... by Rentboy 06/12/2026, 11:43am PDT 
Peter and Mr. Boy are intentionally missing the point. by pinback 06/12/2026, 1:36pm PDT 
How Am I missing the point by Rentboy 06/12/2026, 2:10pm PDT 
I mean, I would put it on a list of top 10 horror movies of the last few decades by blackwater 06/12/2026, 3:06pm PDT 
Okay, everyone forget I said "Godfather", although I think you know what I meant by pinback 06/13/2026, 11:29am PDT 
I think we have different rating philosophies. by blackwater 06/13/2026, 4:12pm PDT 
I've been called snobby by closer friends than you. by pinback 06/13/2026, 7:13pm PDT 
Still B+ by pinback Yesterday, 10:21am PDT 
Re: Still B+ by Ice Cream Jonsey Yesterday, 2:55pm PDT 
|
|