|
by Derek Lollerson, PhD 06/05/2003, 11:52pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senor Barborito wrote:
I need clarification wrote:
Senor Barborito wrote:
I was honestly and truly DYING to keep this from happening because I know what these fuckers are like - they will NEVER. STOP. HOUNDING. YOU.
Senor Barborito wrote:
I see all conversation, all dialogue, as a Darwinian process and the first person who gives up and refuses to engage on legitimate terms any further is the one who lost. I will not be that person in this situation, and I must play by the rules or I have to commit suicide because I have invalidated myself entirely.
I know it's far too late for "Hey, it's just a fucking website," but seriously. You have to win this argument against an unstoppable foe or kill youself?
I have to:
a) Win. Somehow.
b) Start a new website completely seperate from the community etc. but still maintain this one with token effort.
c) Kill myself.
I am not allowed to:
d) Give up.
e) 'Cheat' (knowingly unfairly enforce the rules in any way, or post supportive comments for myself under other nicks like some people have around here in the past).
Unless:
f) ES tells me he is revamping the rules/issuing new orders/whatever.
That is the reality of my situation according to the ethics I actually *do* hold myself to, unlike, say, those brainbox ethics where I admittedly completely fail because I don't really quite believe it.
--SB
It seems the reality of your situation is not congruent among the many crazy voices in your head because you just totally contradicted yourself there with point E
But what do I know I'm just a Doctor not a Lawyer.
DL, PhD |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Months of working #GA mentions into his posts finally pays off for SB by I need clarification 06/05/2003, 8:37pm PDT 
You've got it backwards by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 8:55pm PDT 
Oh, okay. That's totally sane. by I need clarification 06/05/2003, 9:02pm PDT 
No. Not that simple. by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 9:14pm PDT 
Re: No. Not that simple. by Derek Lollerson, PhD 06/05/2003, 11:52pm PDT 
So scary. by Fussbett 06/06/2003, 1:34am PDT 
Re: No. Not that simple. by Noam Lollamsky 06/07/2003, 1:26am PDT 
Goddamn by I need clarification 06/07/2003, 1:30am PDT 
Are you *genuinely*questioning his sanity? by Peanut Gallery Gasps 06/05/2003, 9:15pm PDT 
I like it. NT by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 9:19pm PDT 
No, it's not by Stever Lollerson, Attorney At Law 06/06/2003, 11:20am PDT 
well that's another proxy banned by Stever Lollerson, ExAttorney At Law 06/06/2003, 11:51am PDT 
The truth by Derek Lollerson, PhD 06/07/2003, 10:20pm PDT 
you might want to start using your real nick NT by foogla 06/08/2003, 4:45am PDT 
I quite like this nick, besides it doesn't take a genius to figure out who's who NT by Derek Lollerson, PhD 06/08/2003, 6:29am PDT 
Re: I quite like this nick, besides it doesn't take a genius to figure out who's who by foogla 06/08/2003, 7:11am PDT 
THIS SUBTHREAD REPOSTED TO FOR EMPHASIS by Victor Davis Lollerson 06/08/2003, 11:53am PDT 
Two guys acting like they're the same person... how very childish! by Roop Dirump 06/08/2003, 4:39pm PDT 
SB to GA: OMG LOOK HOW MUCH FUN IT IS TO BAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!! by Jhoh Creexul 06/06/2003, 12:55am PDT 
he's actually taking it surprisingly well. but wtf is wrong with BDR? by Chet Lollerson 06/06/2003, 11:18am PDT 
Re: he's actually taking it surprisingly well. but wtf is wrong with BDR? by FoK 06/06/2003, 11:38am PDT 
note to self: use fresher, edgier Flash animation humor NT by Stever Lollerson, ExAttorney At Law 06/06/2003, 11:57am PDT 
Re: he's actually taking it surprisingly well. but wtf is wrong with BDR? by Random Lurker 06/06/2003, 12:41pm PDT 
Here we go again. by Fullofkittens 06/06/2003, 12:54pm PDT 
Yeah, I know you guys do (got some email, etc.). Don't sweat it. NT by Senor Barborito 06/06/2003, 1:16pm PDT 
Re: Here we go again. by Joshua Michael Lollerson 06/07/2003, 1:49am PDT 
Re: Here we go again. by Steve Kittens 06/07/2003, 2:37am PDT 
On defending yourself. by No Pocky For Kitty 06/08/2003, 9:34am PDT 
Re: he's actually taking it surprisingly well. but wtf is wrong with BDR? by wide hurt 06/06/2003, 1:35pm PDT 
Re: he's actually taking it surprisingly well. but wtf is wrong with BDR? by Stryker 06/06/2003, 12:56pm PDT 
|
|