|
by Senor Barborito 02/25/2003, 7:24pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
FABIO wrote:
Senor Barborito wrote:
Here since you need special attention:
Senor Barborito wrote:
FABIO wrote:
Senor Barborito wrote:
C&C 1 HAD STRATEGY...
...There was no cure whatsoever for the mammoth tank. You just rebutted yourself
The point was there is no rock/paper/scissors cure for the mammoth tank - obviously they CAN be destroyed.
You go off on some bi-polar crazed diatribe (because it's HILLARIOUSLY in character! keep it coming!) on there being no strategy in click-fest RTS's then hold up the no-weakspots mammoth tank as the holy grail cure to this ailment. What the fuck? How does the Napoleonic genius of "build more mammoths than your opponent" beat out rock/paper/scissors?
The point is, there are multiple equally viable solutions to the mammoth tank rush.
You remind me of one of those ADD (another mental disorder! TEH COMEDY!) afflicted fanboys who bitch that they can't win at starcraft by sitting back and building all battlecruisers. So, me building more Battlecruisers than you is the ideal solution rather than laughing at you as my goliaths tear up your BC's at one-third the cost because you were too stupid to build an army consisting of more than one type of unit? Christ almighty I'm GLAD games like C&C generals finally specialized the anti-air/infantry/tank roles of units even further so people can't get away with simple tank rushes anymore.
No, that's entirely my point reversed. I've only been trying to make one point since the beginning, which is that many strategy games today are shipped broken in terms of gameplay. Go read through all my posts again in this thread bearing the following three sentences in mind:
A game in which 1-2 units mass-produced will ALWAYS WIN, and in which there is a predetermined BEST build order is no longer a game - it is a clicking contest because nothing you actually think matters. I have been demanding a game in which mass-production of battle-cruisers is NOT a viable strategem. Starcraft is a game where mass-productions strategems exist and dominate - whether this was rectified in further 'expansion packs' post-facto I neither know nor care about.
The game was shipped and stayed broken for the first few months and shortly before that point people looking for a game with loads of viable strategies moved on elsewhere.
--SB |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Why I hate RTS and how to make the greatest one EVAR by Tom-Foolery Constructor 02/21/2003, 2:29pm PST 
Re: Why I hate RTS and how to make the greatest one EVAR by FABIO 02/21/2003, 7:23pm PST
What's wrong with rock/paper/scissors? by FoK 02/23/2003, 9:37pm PST
Re: What's wrong with rock/paper/scissors? by FABIO 02/23/2003, 11:01pm PST
Re: What's wrong with rock/paper/scissors? by fok 02/23/2003, 11:11pm PST
Did you even read the initial post? by Senor Barborito 02/23/2003, 11:10pm PST
Yeah... by fok 02/24/2003, 12:57am PST
you just rebuted yourself by FABIO 02/24/2003, 10:04am PST
I think it was pretty obvious what I was saying, dumbass by Senor Barborito 02/24/2003, 10:17am PST
Willful Misunderstanding by Mr. Palomar 02/24/2003, 12:39pm PST
Re: I think it was pretty obvious what I was saying, dumbass by FABIO 02/24/2003, 2:24pm PST
Re: I think it was pretty obvious what I was saying, dumbass by FABIO 02/24/2003, 2:26pm PST
I did answer you, dumbass. Christ you're thick. by Senor Barborito 02/24/2003, 11:38pm PST
Re: I did answer you, dumbass. Christ you're thick. by FABIO 02/25/2003, 10:56am PST
Re: I did answer you, dumbass. Christ you're thick. by Senor Barborito 02/25/2003, 7:16pm PST
Fixed quotes. And hopefully clarified for the final time here. by Senor Barborito 02/25/2003, 7:24pm PST
JU-LIE! JU-LIE! JU-LIE! -nt- by Bill Dungsroman 02/26/2003, 5:21pm PST
Re: JU-LIE! JU-LIE! JU-LIE! -nt- by FABIO 02/26/2003, 9:24pm PST
Re: I think it was pretty obvious what I was saying, dumbass by Ice Cream Jonsey 02/24/2003, 3:25pm PST
RE: I think it was pretty obvious what I was saying, dumbass by Alternate789 02/24/2003, 4:16pm PST
Re: I think it was pretty obvious what I was saying, dumbass by curst 02/24/2003, 11:16pm PST
Re: Did you even read the initial post? by Monty Cantsin 02/25/2003, 1:40am PST
That was easily the stupidest thing you have ever written by Senor Barborito 02/25/2003, 2:16am PST
Re: That was easily the stupidest thing you have ever written by Zseni 02/25/2003, 2:35am PST
Koreans: fast index fingers? by Fussbett 02/25/2003, 4:17am PST
No, fast min-max by Senor Barborito 02/25/2003, 7:22am PST
Re: No, fast min-max by ValiumAddict 02/25/2003, 3:39pm PST
Re: No, fast min-max by TehFieryBalrog 07/05/2007, 9:36pm PDT
Re: That was easily the stupidest thing you have ever written by Monty Cantsin 02/25/2003, 4:44pm PST
Re: Did you even read the initial post? by Zseni 02/25/2003, 2:26am PST
Re: Did you even read the initial post? by Monty Cantsin 02/25/2003, 4:20pm PST
Re: Did you even read the initial post? by Zseni 02/25/2003, 5:28pm PST
Queneau plays Black and White by Mr. Palomar 02/25/2003, 5:59pm PST
Re: Did you even read the initial post? by Monty Cantsin 02/25/2003, 7:35pm PST
Re: Did you even read the initial post? by TehFieryBalrog 07/05/2007, 9:40pm PDT
If you're going to respond to 2003 you could get the title right. NT by Soul Calibur 07/05/2007, 9:42pm PDT
Re: Did you even read the initial post? by Ray, of Light 02/25/2003, 3:39am PST
I used to win money playing Quake regularly by Senor Barborito 02/25/2003, 7:41am PST
"See, I'm really good a video games!" by Irritating kid 02/25/2003, 9:20am PST
Re: "See, I'm really good a video games!" by FABIO 02/25/2003, 11:55am PST
Hey, that's my line. by Fussbett 02/25/2003, 4:06pm PST
Video Games, Chess, and Laziness. by mrs. johnson 02/25/2003, 4:40pm PST
Yes, exactly. by Senor Barborito 02/25/2003, 7:29pm PST
Re: Yes, exactly. by mark 02/25/2003, 8:36pm PST
This argument is pretty much over by now, right? by Bodybag 02/25/2003, 9:08pm PST
There isn't one strategy for chess that will always win NT by Senor Barborito 02/25/2003, 11:49pm PST
that's guy's a fucking crackpot by FABIO 02/25/2003, 6:35pm PST
I don't know about suspense games, but much of his strategy talk is dead on-nt- by mark 02/25/2003, 6:51pm PST
it's all DePalma's fault by jeep 02/25/2003, 7:45pm PST
Re: it's all DePalma's fault by FABIO 02/25/2003, 10:44pm PST
Re: "See, I'm really good a video games!" by TehFieryBalrog 07/05/2007, 9:43pm PDT
This guy is new and already knows SB was crazy and Zseni is bad at everything by Flavilio 07/06/2007, 12:10am PDT
Battlenet screenname is Balrog200 or soapie on USEast, channel scu NT by TehFieryBalrog 07/07/2007, 12:32am PDT
alternatively aim screenname is balrog36 NT by TehFieryBalrog 07/07/2007, 12:47am PDT
^^^ This guy loves balrogs. NT by Any and all balrogs. 07/07/2007, 2:57am PDT
Re: Did you even read the initial post? by Monty Cantsin 02/25/2003, 5:03pm PST
You CAN turtle in RA2+YR by Bodybag 02/25/2003, 6:57pm PST
Re: You CAN turtle in RA2+YR by jeep 02/25/2003, 7:51pm PST
Re: You CAN turtle in RA2+YR by Bodybag 02/25/2003, 8:17pm PST
Re: Did you even read the initial post? by Ray, of Light 02/25/2003, 8:00pm PST
StarScripts are tomorrow's Blueprints by Fussbett 10/30/2006, 11:30pm PST
|
|
