I need clarification wrote:


Yes. Using the example of our straw men proves you need straw men to make your argument, idiots!!

Also:

1. "Kill a sufficient number of terror providers to keep the supply of anti-american attack to a low hum" is the most self-contradictory statement in the history of the Bush II administration, which is saying something. The fact you can write something like that without any evidence of irony or even self-awareness indicates you not only buy Rumsfeld's drivel whole cloth, you have trouble formulating opinions during the respite between White House talking points releases.

I need clarification wrote:


Wait a minute. Because Rumsfeld was appointed by an unelected president means his cracked vision of American foreign policy (invade! invade! invade!) is more legitimate than anyone else's? Get the fuck out of my country, fag. I'm talking about you, Lizard_King. If you're willing to subject your life and everyone else's to the whim of these idiots, that's your prerogative. But trying to win an argument you've already helped yourself lose by saying only those in charge get a say in how things are done goes against everything this country stands for, and I won't have traitorous bastards in this country. At least not in shackles. Please escort yourself to the nearest border or coast and keep walking.

Thanks!